On the lifting degree of girth-8 QC-LDPC codes

December 03, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Designs, Codes and Cryptography

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Haoran Xiong, Guanghui Wang, Zhiming Ma, Guiying Yan arXiv ID 2412.02526 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Citations 0 Venue Designs, Codes and Cryptography Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
The lifting degree and the deterministic construction of quasi-cyclic low-density parity-check (QC-LDPC) codes have been extensively studied, with many construction methods in the literature, including those based on finite geometry, array-based codes, computer search, and combinatorial techniques. In this paper, we focus on the lifting degree $p$ required for achieving a girth of 8 in $(3,L)$ fully connected QC-LDPC codes, and we propose an improvement over the classical lower bound $p\geq 2L-1$, enhancing it to $p\geq \sqrt{5L^2-11L+\frac{13}{2}}+\frac{1}{2}$. Moreover, we demonstrate that for girth-8 QC-LDPC codes containing an arithmetic row in the exponent matrix, a necessary condition for achieving a girth of 8 is $p\geq \frac{1}{2}L^2+\frac{1}{2}L$. Additionally, we present a corresponding deterministic construction of $(3,L)$ QC-LDPC codes with girth 8 for any $p\geq \frac{1}{2}L^2+\frac{1}{2}L+\lfloor \frac{L-1}{2}\rfloor$, which approaches the lower bound of $\frac{1}{2}L^2+\frac{1}{2}L$. Under the same conditions, this construction achieves a smaller lifting degree compared to prior methods. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed order of lifting degree matches the smallest known, on the order of $\frac{1}{2}L^2+\mathcal{O} (L)$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Theory

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted