The Space Complexity of Approximating Logistic Loss

December 03, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Neural Information Processing Systems

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Gregory Dexter, Petros Drineas, Rajiv Khanna arXiv ID 2412.02639 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 1 Venue Neural Information Processing Systems Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We provide space complexity lower bounds for data structures that approximate logistic loss up to $Ξ΅$-relative error on a logistic regression problem with data $\mathbf{X} \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$ and labels $\mathbf{y} \in \{-1,1\}^d$. The space complexity of existing coreset constructions depend on a natural complexity measure $ΞΌ_\mathbf{y}(\mathbf{X})$, first defined in (Munteanu, 2018). We give an $\tildeΞ©(\frac{d}{Ξ΅^2})$ space complexity lower bound in the regime $ΞΌ_\mathbf{y}(\mathbf{X}) = O(1)$ that shows existing coresets are optimal in this regime up to lower order factors. We also prove a general $\tildeΞ©(d\cdot ΞΌ_\mathbf{y}(\mathbf{X}))$ space lower bound when $Ξ΅$ is constant, showing that the dependency on $ΞΌ_\mathbf{y}(\mathbf{X})$ is not an artifact of mergeable coresets. Finally, we refute a prior conjecture that $ΞΌ_\mathbf{y}(\mathbf{X})$ is hard to compute by providing an efficient linear programming formulation, and we empirically compare our algorithm to prior approximate methods.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted