PoTable: Towards Systematic Thinking via Stage-oriented Plan-then-Execute Reasoning on Tables

December 05, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· + Add venue

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Qingyang Mao, Qi Liu, Zhi Li, Mingyue Cheng, Zheng Zhang, Rui Li arXiv ID 2412.04272 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 2 Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In recent years, table reasoning has garnered substantial research interest, particularly its integration with Large Language Models (LLMs) which revolutionize natural language applications. Existing typical LLM-based studies realize step-by-step reasoning, promoting the capabilities in table understanding and analyzing. While these approaches emphasize autonomous exploration to accomplish the task objective, they overlook systematic thinking in the reasoning process, leading to potential risks of omitted steps, disorganized logic and misleading results. In this paper, we propose PoTable, a novel stage-oriented plan-then-execute reasoning approach that achieves systematic thinking on tables. Specifically, PoTable deploys several distinct tabular analytical stages with clear objectives and achieves stage-by-stage reasoning. To accomplish the stage-specific goal, PoTable conducts plan-then-execute reasoning, which first plans the operation chain under the stage objective, and then executes each operation sequentially through code generation, real-time running and feedback processing. As a result, PoTable can produce reliable table reasoning results with highly accurate, steply commented and completely executable programs. It possesses a high degree of alignment with a distinguished tabular data analyst, offering advantages of high accuracy and explainability. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments over four evaluation datasets from WikiTQ and TabFact benchmarks, where the results demonstrate the effectiveness of PoTable, as well as the efficiency and explainability.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted