Proportionally Fair Matching via Randomized Rounding

December 15, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sharmila Duppala, Nathaniel Grammel, Juan Luque, Calum MacRury, Aravind Srinivasan arXiv ID 2412.11238 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 0 Venue AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Given an edge-colored graph, the goal of the proportional fair matching problem is to find a maximum weight matching while ensuring proportional representation (with respect to the number of edges) of each color. The colors may correspond to demographic groups or other protected traits where we seek to ensure roughly equal representation from each group. It is known that, assuming ETH, it is impossible to approximate the problem with $\ell$ colors in time $2^{o(\ell)} n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ (i.e., subexponential in $\ell$) even on \emph{unweighted path graphs}. Further, even determining the existence of a non-empty matching satisfying proportionality is NP-Hard. To overcome this hardness, we relax the stringent proportional fairness constraints to a probabilistic notion. We introduce a notion we call $Ξ΄$-\textsc{ProbablyAlmostFair}, where we ensure proportionality up to a factor of at most $(1 \pm Ξ΄)$ for some small $Ξ΄>0$ with high probability. The violation $Ξ΄$ can be brought arbitrarily close to $0$ for some \emph{good} instances with large values of matching size. We propose and analyze simple and fast algorithms for bipartite graphs that achieve constant-factor approximation guarantees, and return a $Ξ΄$-\textsc{ProbablyAlmostFair} matching.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted