Comparative Analysis of YOLOv9, YOLOv10 and RT-DETR for Real-Time Weed Detection

December 18, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ECCV Workshops

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ahmet Oğuz Saltık, Alicia Allmendinger, Anthony Stein arXiv ID 2412.13490 Category cs.CV: Computer Vision Citations 16 Venue ECCV Workshops Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art object detection models, including YOLOv9, YOLOv10, and RT-DETR, for the task of weed detection in smart-spraying applications focusing on three classes: Sugarbeet, Monocot, and Dicot. The performance of these models is compared based on mean Average Precision (mAP) scores and inference times on different GPU and CPU devices. We consider various model variations, such as nano, small, medium, large alongside different image resolutions (320px, 480px, 640px, 800px, 960px). The results highlight the trade-offs between inference time and detection accuracy, providing valuable insights for selecting the most suitable model for real-time weed detection. This study aims to guide the development of efficient and effective smart spraying systems, enhancing agricultural productivity through precise weed management.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Computer Vision

πŸŒ… πŸŒ… Old Age

Fast R-CNN

Ross Girshick

cs.CV πŸ› ICCV πŸ“š 27.7K cites 11 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted