Differentially Private Substring and Document Counting

December 18, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Proc. ACM Manag. Data

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Giulia Bernardini, Philip Bille, Inge Li GΓΈrtz, Teresa Anna Steiner arXiv ID 2412.13813 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CR Citations 1 Venue Proc. ACM Manag. Data Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Differential privacy is the gold standard for privacy in data analysis. In many data analysis applications, the data is a database of documents. For databases consisting of many documents, one of the most fundamental problems is that of pattern matching and computing (i) how often a pattern appears as a substring in the database (substring counting) and (ii) how many documents in the collection contain the pattern as a substring (document counting). In this paper, we initiate the theoretical study of substring and document counting under differential privacy. We give an $Ξ΅$-differentially private data structure solving this problem for all patterns simultaneously with a maximum additive error of $O(\ell \cdot\mathrm{polylog}(n\ell|Ξ£|))$, where $\ell$ is the maximum length of a document in the database, $n$ is the number of documents, and $|Ξ£|$ is the size of the alphabet. We show that this is optimal up to a $O(\mathrm{polylog}(n\ell))$ factor. Further, we show that for $(Ξ΅,Ξ΄)$-differential privacy, the bound for document counting can be improved to $O(\sqrt{\ell} \cdot\mathrm{polylog}(n\ell|Ξ£|))$. Additionally, our data structures are efficient. In particular, our data structures use $O(n\ell^2)$ space, $O(n^2\ell^4)$ preprocessing time, and $O(|P|)$ query time where $P$ is the query pattern. Along the way, we develop a new technique for differentially privately computing a general class of counting functions on trees of independent interest. Our data structures immediately lead to improved algorithms for related problems, such as privately mining frequent substrings and $q$-grams. For $q$-grams, we further improve the preprocessing time of the data structure.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted