Evaluation of radiomic feature harmonization techniques for benign and malignant pulmonary nodules
December 21, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Claire Huchthausen, Menglin Shi, Gabriel L. A. de Sousa, Jonathan Colen, Emery Shelley, James Larner, Einsley Janowski, Krishni Wijesooriya
arXiv ID
2412.16758
Category
physics.med-ph
Cross-listed
cs.CV
Citations
1
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radiomics provides quantitative features of pulmonary nodules (PNs) which could aid lung cancer diagnosis, but medical image acquisition variability is an obstacle to clinical application. Acquisition effects may differ between radiomic features from benign vs. malignant PNs. PURPOSE: We evaluated how to account for differences between benign and malignant PNs when correcting radiomic features' acquisition dependency. METHODS: We used 567 chest CT scans grouped as benign, malignant, or lung cancer screening (mixed benign, malignant). ComBat harmonization was applied to extracted features for variation in 4 acquisition parameters. We compared: harmonizing without distinction, harmonizing with a covariate to preserve distinctions between subgroups, and harmonizing subgroups separately. Significant ($p\le0.05$) Kruskal-Wallis tests showed whether harmonization removed acquisition dependency. A LASSO-SVM pipeline was trained on successfully harmonized features to predict malignancy. To evaluate predictive information in these features, the trained harmonization estimators and predictive model were applied to unseen test sets. Harmonization and predictive performance were assessed for 10 trials of 5-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: An average 2.1% of features (95% CI:1.9-2.4%) were acquisition-independent when harmonized without distinction, 27.3% (95% CI:25.7-28.9%) when harmonized with a covariate, and 90.9% (95% CI:90.4-91.5%) when harmonized separately. Data harmonized separately or with a covariate trained models with higher ROC-AUC for screening scans than data harmonized without distinction between benign and malignant PNs (Delong test, adjusted $p\le0.05$). CONCLUSIONS: Radiomic features of benign and malignant PNs need different corrective transformations to recover acquisition-independent distributions. This can be done by harmonizing separately or with a covariate.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β physics.med-ph
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Gibbs-Ringing Artifact Removal Based on Local Subvoxel-shifts
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning-enabled Virtual Histological Staining of Biological Samples
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Eigenspectra optoacoustic tomography achieves quantitative blood oxygenation imaging deep in tissues
π
π
The Cartographer
Deep learning for biomedical photoacoustic imaging: A review
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The reliability of a deep learning model in clinical out-of-distribution MRI data: a multicohort study
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted