De-centering the (Traditional) User: Multistakeholder Evaluation of Recommender Systems

January 09, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Robin Burke, Gediminas Adomavicius, Toine Bogers, Tommaso Di Noia, Dominik Kowald, Julia Neidhardt, Γ–zlem Γ–zgΓΆbek, Maria Soledad Pera, Nava Tintarev, JΓΌrgen Ziegler arXiv ID 2501.05170 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 11 Venue Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Multistakeholder recommender systems are those that account for the impacts and preferences of multiple groups of individuals, not just the end users receiving recommendations. Due to their complexity, these systems cannot be evaluated strictly by the overall utility of a single stakeholder, as is often the case of more mainstream recommender system applications. In this article, we focus our discussion on the challenges of multistakeholder evaluation of recommender systems. We bring attention to the different aspects involved -- from the range of stakeholders involved (including but not limited to providers and consumers) to the values and specific goals of each relevant stakeholder. We discuss how to move from theoretical principles to practical implementation, providing specific use case examples. Finally, we outline open research directions for the RecSys community to explore. We aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners about incorporating these complex and domain-dependent issues of evaluation in the course of designing, developing, and researching applications with multistakeholder aspects.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted