On Extended Concentration Inequalities for Fast JL Embeddings of Infinite Sets

January 23, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Edem Boahen, March T. Boedihardjo, Rafael Chiclana, Mark Iwen arXiv ID 2501.14010 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed math.PR Citations 0 Venue International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
The Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) lemma allows subsets of a high-dimensional space to be embedded into a lower-dimensional space while approximately preserving all pairwise Euclidean distances. This important result has inspired an extensive literature, with a significant portion dedicated to constructing structured random matrices with fast matrix-vector multiplication algorithms that generate such embeddings for finite point sets. In this paper, we briefly consider fast JL embedding matrices for {\it infinite} subsets of $\mathbb{R}^d$. Prior work in this direction such as \cite{oymak2018isometric, mendelson2023column} has focused on constructing fast JL matrices $HD \in \mathbb{R}^{k \times d}$ by multiplying structured matrices with RIP(-like) properties $H \in \mathbb{R}^{k \times d}$ against a random diagonal matrix $D \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times d}$. However, utilizing RIP(-like) matrices $H$ in this fashion necessarily has the unfortunate side effect that the resulting embedding dimension $k$ must depend on the ambient dimension $d$ no matter how simple the infinite set is that one aims to embed. Motivated by this, we explore an alternate strategy for removing this $d$-dependence from $k$ herein: Extending a concentration inequality proven by Ailon and Liberty \cite{Ailon2008fast} in the hope of later utilizing it in a chaining argument to obtain a near-optimal result for infinite sets. %, and $(ii)$ utilizing a simple secondary Gaussian embedding of an initial fast JL embedding of a given infinite set. Though this strategy ultimately fails to provide the near-optimal embedding dimension we seek, along the way we obtain a stronger-than-sub-exponential extension of the concentration inequality in \cite{Ailon2008fast} which may be of independent interest.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted