On the Locality of the LovΓ‘sz Local Lemma

February 17, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Symposium on the Theory of Computing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Peter Davies-Peck arXiv ID 2502.11690 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DC, math.PR Citations 2 Venue Symposium on the Theory of Computing Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
The LovΓ‘sz Local Lemma is a versatile result in probability theory, characterizing circumstances in which a collection of $n$ `bad events', each occurring with probability at most $p$ and dependent on a set of underlying random variables, can be avoided. It is a central tool of the probabilistic method, since it can be used to show that combinatorial objects satisfying some desirable properties must exist. While the original proof was existential, subsequent work has shown algorithms for the LovΓ‘sz Local Lemma: that is, in circumstances in which the lemma proves the existence of some object, these algorithms can constructively find such an object. One main strand of these algorithms, which began with Moser and Tardos's well-known result (JACM 2010), involves iteratively resampling the dependent variables of satisfied bad events until none remain satisfied. In this paper, we present a novel analysis that can be applied to resampling-style LovΓ‘sz Local Lemma algorithms. This analysis shows that an output assignment for the dependent variables of most events can be determined only from $O(\log \log_{1/p} n)$-radius local neighborhoods, and that the events whose variables may still require resampling can be identified from these neighborhoods. This allows us to improve randomized complexities for the constructive LovΓ‘sz Local Lemma (with polynomial criterion) in several parallel and distributed models. In particular, we obtain: 1) A LOCAL algorithm with $O(\log\log_{1/p} n)$ node-averaged complexity (while matching the $O(\log_{1/p} n)$ worst-case complexity of Chung, Pettie, and Su). 2) An algorithm for the LCA and VOLUME models requiring $d^{O(\log\log_{1/p} n)}$ probes per query. 3) An $O(\log\log\log_{1/p} n)$-round algorithm for CONGESTED CLIQUE, linear space MPC, and Heterogenous MPC.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted