Arboricity and Random Edge Queries Matter for Triangle Counting using Sublinear Queries

February 21, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Arijit Bishnu, Debarshi Chanda, Gopinath Mishra arXiv ID 2502.15379 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 5 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Given a simple, unweighted, undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ with $|V|=n$ and $|E|=m$, and parameters $0 < \varepsilon, Ξ΄<1$, along with \texttt{Degree}, \texttt{Neighbour}, \texttt{Edge} and \texttt{RandomEdge} query access to $G$, we provide a query based randomized algorithm to generate an estimate $\widehat{T}$ of the number of triangles $T$ in $G$, such that $\widehat{T} \in [(1-\varepsilon)T , (1+\varepsilon)T]$ with probability at least $1-Ξ΄$. The query complexity of our algorithm is $\widetilde{O}\left({m Ξ±\log(1/Ξ΄)}/{\varepsilon^3 T}\right)$, where $Ξ±$ is the arboricity of $G$. Our work can be seen as a continuation in the line of recent works [Eden et al., SIAM J Comp., 2017; Assadi et al., ITCS 2019; Eden et al. SODA 2020] that considered subgraph or triangle counting with or without the use of \texttt{RandomEdge} query. Of these works, Eden et al. [SODA 2020] considers the role of arboricity. Our work considers how \texttt{RandomEdge} query can leverage the notion of arboricity. Furthermore, continuing in the line of work of Assadi et al. [APPROX/RANDOM 2022], we also provide a lower bound of $\widetildeΞ©\left({m Ξ±\log(1/Ξ΄)}/{\varepsilon^2 T}\right)$ that matches the upper bound exactly on arboricity and the parameter $Ξ΄$ and almost on $\varepsilon$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted