From Chinese Postman to Salesman and Beyond II: Inapproximability and Parameterized Complexity

February 25, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Fabian Frei, Ahmed Ghazy, Tim A. Hartmann, Florian HΓΆrsch, DΓ‘niel Marx arXiv ID 2502.18541 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
A well-studied continuous model of graphs considers each edge as a continuous unit-length interval of points. In the problem $Ξ΄$-Tour defined within this model, the objective to find a shortest tour that comes within a distance of $Ξ΄$ of every point on every edge. This parameterized problem was introduced in the predecessor to this article and shown to be essentially equivalent to the Chinese Postman problem for $Ξ΄= 0$, to the graphic Travel Salesman Problem (TSP) for $Ξ΄= 1/2$, and close to first Vertex Cover and then Dominating Set for even larger $Ξ΄$. Moreover, approximation algorithms for multiple parameter ranges were provided. In this article, we provide complementing inapproximability bounds and examine the fixed-parameter tractability of the problem. On the one hand, we show the following: (1) For every fixed $0 < Ξ΄< 3/2$, the problem $Ξ΄$-Tour is APX-hard, while for every fixed $Ξ΄\geq 3/2$, the problem has no polynomial-time $o(\log{n})$-approximation unless P = NP. Our techniques also yield the new result that TSP remains APX-hard on cubic (and even cubic bipartite) graphs. (2) For every fixed $0 < Ξ΄< 3/2$, the problem $Ξ΄$-Tour is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) when parameterized by the length of a shortest tour, while it is W[2]-hard for every fixed $Ξ΄\geq 3/2$ and para-NP-hard for $Ξ΄$ being part of the input. On the other hand, if $Ξ΄$ is considered to be part of the input, then an interesting nontrivial phenomenon occurs when $Ξ΄$ is a constant fraction of the number of vertices: (3) If $Ξ΄$ is part of the input, then the problem can be solved in time $f(k)n^{O(k)}$, where $k = \lceil n/Ξ΄\rceil$; however, assuming the Exponential-Time Hypothesis (ETH), there is no algorithm that solves the problem and runs in time $f(k)n^{o(k/\log k)}$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted