An FPT Constant-Factor Approximation Algorithm for Correlation Clustering

March 01, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Computing and Combinatorics Conference

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jianqi Zhou, Zhongyi Zhang, Jiong Guo arXiv ID 2503.00281 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 0 Venue International Computing and Combinatorics Conference Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
The Correlation Clustering problem is one of the most extensively studied clustering formulations due to its wide applications in machine learning, data mining, computational biology and other areas. We consider the Correlation Clustering problem on general graphs, where given an undirected graph (maybe not complete) with each edge being labeled with $\langle + \rangle$ or $\langle - \rangle$, the goal is to partition the vertices into clusters to minimize the number of the disagreements with the edge labeling: the number of $\langle - \rangle$ edges within clusters plus the number of $\langle + \rangle$ edges between clusters. Hereby, a $\langle + \rangle$ (or $\langle - \rangle$) edge means that its end-vertices are similar (or dissimilar) and should belong to the same cluster (or different clusters), and ``missing'' edges are used to denote that we do not know if those end-vertices are similar or dissimilar. Correlation Clustering is NP-hard, even if the input graph is complete, and Unique-Games hard to obtain polynomial-time constant approximation on general graphs. With a complete graph as input, Correlation Clustering admits a $(1.994+\varepsilon )$-approximation. We investigate Correlation Clustering on general graphs from the perspective of parameterized approximability. We set the parameter $k$ as the minimum number of vertices whose removal results in a complete graph, and obtain the first FPT constant-factor approximation for Correlation Clustering on general graphs which runs in $2^{O(k^3)} \cdot \textrm{poly}(n)$ time.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted