MFC 5.0: An exascale many-physics flow solver
March 11, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Computer Physics Communications
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Benjamin Wilfong, Henry A. Le Berre, Anand Radhakrishnan, Ansh Gupta, Daniel J. Vickers, Diego Vaca-Revelo, Dimitrios Adam, Haocheng Yu, Hyeoksu Lee, Jose Rodolfo Chreim, Mirelys Carcana Barbosa, Yanjun Zhang, Esteban Cisneros-Garibay, Aswin Gnanaskandan, Mauro Rodriguez, Reuben D. Budiardja, Stephen Abbott, Tim Colonius, Spencer H. Bryngelson
arXiv ID
2503.07953
Category
physics.flu-dyn
Cross-listed
cs.DC
Citations
10
Venue
Computer Physics Communications
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Many problems of interest in engineering, medicine, and the fundamental sciences rely on high-fidelity flow simulation, making performant computational fluid dynamics solvers a mainstay of the open-source software community. Previous work, MFC 3.0, was published, documented, and made open-source by Bryngelson et al. CPC (2021) features numerous physical features, numerical methods, and scalable infrastructure. MFC 5.0 is a significant update to MFC 3.0, featuring a broad set of well-established and novel physical models and numerical methods, as well as the introduction of GPU and APU (or superchip) acceleration. We exhibit state-of-the-art performance and ideal scaling on the first two exascale supercomputers, OLCF's Frontier and LLNL's El Capitan. Combined with MFC's single-accelerator performance, MFC achieves exascale computation in practice and has achieved the largest-to-date public CFD simulation at 200 trillion grid points, earning it a 2025 ACM Gordon Bell Prize finalist. New physical features include the immersed boundary method, $N$-fluid phase change, Euler-Euler and Euler-Lagrange sub-grid bubble models, fluid-structure interaction, hypo- and hyper-elastic materials, chemically reacting flow, two-material surface tension, magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), and more. Numerical techniques now represent the current state-of-the-art, including general relaxation characteristic boundary conditions, WENO variants, Strang splitting for stiff sub-grid flow features, and low Mach number treatments. Weak scaling to tens of thousands of GPUs on OLCF's Summit and Frontier, and LLNL's El Capitan, achieves efficiencies within 5% of ideal to over 90% of their respective system sizes. Strong scaling results for a 16-fold increase in device count show parallel efficiencies exceeding 90% on OLCF Frontier.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β physics.flu-dyn
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Efficient collective swimming by harnessing vortices through deep reinforcement learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
NVIDIA SimNet^{TM}: an AI-accelerated multi-physics simulation framework
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Teaching the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations to Fast Neural Surrogate Models in 3D
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Prediction of Reynolds Stresses in High-Mach-Number Turbulent Boundary Layers using Physics-Informed Machine Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
From Deep to Physics-Informed Learning of Turbulence: Diagnostics
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted