Buffered Partially-Persistent External-Memory Search Trees

March 11, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Embedded Systems and Applications

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Gerth StΓΈlting Brodal, Casper Moldrup Rysgaard, Rolf Svenning arXiv ID 2503.08211 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 0 Venue Embedded Systems and Applications Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
We present an optimal partially-persistent external-memory search tree with amortized I/O bounds matching those achieved by the non-persistent $B^{\varepsilon}$-tree by Brodal and Fagerberg [SODA 2003]. In a partially-persistent data structure each update creates a new version of the data structure, where all past versions can be queried, but only the current version can be updated. All operations should be efficient with respect to the size $N_v$ of the accessed version $v$. For any parameter $0<\varepsilon<1$, our data structure supports insertions and deletions in amortized $O\!\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon B^{1-\varepsilon}}\log_B N_v\right)$ I/Os, where $B$ is the external-memory block size. It also supports successor and range reporting queries in amortized $O\!\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\log_B N_v+K/B\right)$ I/Os, where $K$ is the number of values reported. The space usage of the data structure is linear in the total number of updates. We make the standard and minimal assumption that the internal memory has size $M \geq 2B$. The previous state-of-the-art external-memory partially-persistent search tree by Arge, Danner and Teh [JEA 2003] supports all operations in worst-case $O\!\left(\log_B N_v+K/B\right)$ I/Os, matching the bounds achieved by the classical B-tree by Bayer and McCreight [Acta Informatica 1972]. Our data structure successfully combines buffering updates with partial persistence. The I/O bounds can also be achieved in the worst-case sense, by slightly modifying our data structure and under the requirement that the memory size $M = Ξ©\!\left(B^{1-\varepsilon}\log_2(\max_v N_v)\right)$. The worst-case result slightly improves the memory requirement over the previous ephemeral external-memory dictionary by Das, Iacono, and Nekrich (ISAAC 2022), who achieved matching worst-case I/O bounds but required $M=Ξ©\!\left(B\log_B N\right)$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted