Understanding Codebase like a Professional! Human-AI Collaboration for Code Comprehension
April 06, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· + Add venue
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Jie Gao, Yue Xue, Xiaofei Xie, SoeMin Thant, Erika Lee, Bowen Xu
arXiv ID
2504.04553
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
0
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Understanding an unfamiliar codebase is an essential task for developers in various scenarios, such as during the onboarding process. Especially when the codebase is large and time is limited, achieving a decent level of comprehension remains challenging for both experienced and novice developers, even with the assistance of LLMs. Existing studies have shown that LLMs often fail to support users in understanding code structures or to provide user-centered, adaptive, and dynamic assistance in real-world settings. To address this, we propose learning from the perspective of a unique role, code auditors, whose work often requires them to quickly familiarize themselves with new code projects on a weekly or even daily basis. To achieve this, we recruited and interviewed 8 code auditing practitioners to understand how they master codebase understanding. We identified four design opportunities for an LLM-based codebase understanding system: supporting cognitive alignment through automated codebase information extraction, decomposition, and representation, as well as reducing manual effort and conversational distraction through interaction design. To validate these four design opportunities, we designed a system prototype, CodeMap, that provides dynamic information extraction and representation aligned with the human cognitive flow and enables interactive switching among hierarchical codebase visualizations. We then conducted a user study with nine experienced developers and six novice developers. Our results demonstrate that CodeMap significantly improved users' perceived intuitiveness, ease of use, and usefulness in supporting code comprehension, while reducing their reliance on reading and interpreting LLM responses by 79% and increasing map usage time by 90% compared to the static visualization analysis tool.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted