Neural Signal Compression using RAMAN tinyML Accelerator for BCI Applications
April 09, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Adithya Krishna, Sohan Debnath, Madhuvanthi Srivatsav, AndrΓ© van Schaik, Mahesh Mehendale, Chetan Singh Thakur
arXiv ID
2504.06996
Category
cs.AR: Hardware Architecture
Cross-listed
cs.HC,
cs.LG
Citations
1
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
High-quality, multi-channel neural recording is indispensable for neuroscience research and clinical applications. Large-scale brain recordings often produce vast amounts of data that must be wirelessly transmitted for subsequent offline analysis and decoding, especially in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) utilizing high-density intracortical recordings with hundreds or thousands of electrodes. However, transmitting raw neural data presents significant challenges due to limited communication bandwidth and resultant excessive heating. To address this challenge, we propose a neural signal compression scheme utilizing Convolutional Autoencoders (CAEs), which achieves a compression ratio of up to 150 for compressing local field potentials (LFPs). The CAE encoder section is implemented on RAMAN, an energy-efficient tinyML accelerator designed for edge computing. RAMAN leverages sparsity in activation and weights through zero skipping, gating, and weight compression techniques. Additionally, we employ hardware-software co-optimization by pruning the CAE encoder model parameters using a hardware-aware balanced stochastic pruning strategy, resolving workload imbalance issues and eliminating indexing overhead to reduce parameter storage requirements by up to 32.4%. Post layout simulation shows that the RAMAN encoder can be implemented in a TSMC 65-nm CMOS process, occupying a core area of 0.0187 mm2 per channel. Operating at a clock frequency of 2 MHz and a supply voltage of 1.2 V, the estimated power consumption is 15.1 uW per channel for the proposed DS-CAE1 model. For functional validation, the RAMAN encoder was also deployed on an Efinix Ti60 FPGA, utilizing 37.3k LUTs and 8.6k flip-flops. The compressed neural data from RAMAN is reconstructed offline with SNDR of 22.6 dB and 27.4 dB, along with R2 scores of 0.81 and 0.94, respectively, evaluated on two monkey neural recordings.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Hardware Architecture
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Corona: System Implications of Emerging Nanophotonic Technology
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A scalable multi-core architecture with heterogeneous memory structures for Dynamic Neuromorphic Asynchronous Processors (DYNAPs)
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
SpAtten: Efficient Sparse Attention Architecture with Cascade Token and Head Pruning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Neural Cache: Bit-Serial In-Cache Acceleration of Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
SpArch: Efficient Architecture for Sparse Matrix Multiplication
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted