Voice Interaction With Conversational AI Could Facilitate Thoughtful Reflection and Substantive Revision in Writing

April 11, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants (In2Writing 2025)

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jiho Kim, Philippe Laban, Xiang 'Anthony' Chen, Kenneth C. Arnold arXiv ID 2504.08687 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.CY Citations 1 Venue Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants (In2Writing 2025) Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Writing well requires not only expressing ideas but also refining them through revision, a process facilitated by reflection. Prior research suggests that feedback delivered through dialogues, such as those in writing center tutoring sessions, can help writers reflect more thoughtfully on their work compared to static feedback. Recent advancements in multi-modal large language models (LLMs) now offer new possibilities for supporting interactive and expressive voice-based reflection in writing. In particular, we propose that LLM-generated static feedback can be repurposed as conversation starters, allowing writers to seek clarification, request examples, and ask follow-up questions, thereby fostering deeper reflection on their writing. We argue that voice-based interaction can naturally facilitate this conversational exchange, encouraging writers' engagement with higher-order concerns, facilitating iterative refinement of their reflections, and reduce cognitive load compared to text-based interactions. To investigate these effects, we propose a formative study exploring how text vs. voice input influence writers' reflection and subsequent revisions. Findings from this study will inform the design of intelligent and interactive writing tools, offering insights into how voice-based interactions with LLM-powered conversational agents can support reflection and revision.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted