Evolutionary Defense: Advancing Moving Target Strategies with Bio-Inspired Reinforcement Learning to Secure Misconfigured Software Applications
April 13, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Niloofar Heidarikohol, Shuvalaxmi Dass, Akbar Siami Namin
arXiv ID
2504.09465
Category
cs.SE: Software Engineering
Citations
1
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Improper configurations in software systems often create vulnerabilities, leaving them open to exploitation. Static architectures exacerbate this issue by allowing misconfigurations to persist, providing adversaries with opportunities to exploit them during attacks. To address this challenge, a dynamic proactive defense strategy known as Moving Target Defense (MTD) can be applied. MTD continually changes the attack surface of the system, thwarting potential threats. In the previous research, we developed a proof of concept for a single-player MTD game model called RL-MTD, which utilizes Reinforcement Learning (RL) to generate dynamic secure configurations. While the model exhibited satisfactory performance in generating secure configurations, it grappled with an unoptimized and sparse search space, leading to performance issues. To tackle this obstacle, this paper addresses the search space optimization problem by leveraging two bio-inspired search algorithms: Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). Additionally, we extend our base RL-MTD model by integrating these algorithms, resulting in the creation of PSO-RL andGA-RL. We compare the performance of three models: base RL-MTD, GA-RL, and PSO-RL, across four misconfigured SUTs in terms of generating the most secure configuration. Results show that the optimal search space derived from both GA-RL and PSO-RL significantly enhances the performance of the base RL-MTD model compared to the version without optimized search space. While both GA-RL and PSO-RL demonstrate effective search capabilities, PSO-RL slightly outperforms GA-RL for most SUTs. Overall, both algorithms excel in seeking an optimal search space which in turn improves the performance of the model in generating optimal secure configuration.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Software Engineering
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
An Overview on Smart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For Smart Contracts
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ContractFuzzer: Fuzzing Smart Contracts for Vulnerability Detection
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted