VR MRI Training for Adolescents: A Comparative Study of Gamified VR, Passive VR, 360Β° Video, and Traditional Educational Video
April 14, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π 2025 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yue Yang, Mengyao Guo, Yuxuan Wu, Wally Niu, Emmanuel A Corona, Bruce Daniel, Christoph Leuze, Fred Baik
arXiv ID
2504.09955
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
4
Venue
2025 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Meta Quest Store: https://www.meta.com/experiences/stanford-mri-simulator/8205539289482347/ Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can be a stressful experience for pediatric patients due to the loud acoustic environment, enclosed scanner bore, and a prolonged requirement to remain still. While sedation is commonly used to manage anxiety and motion, it carries clinical risks and logistical burdens. Traditional preparatory approaches, such as instructional videos and mock scans, often lack engagement for older children and adolescents. In this study, we present a comparative evaluation of four MRI preparation modalities: (1) a gamified virtual reality (VR) simulation that trains stillness through real-time feedback; (2) a passive VR experience replicating the MRI environment without interactivity; (3) a 360Β° first-person video of a real MRI procedure; and (4) a standard 2D educational video. Using a within-subjects design (N = 11, ages 10-16), we assess each method's impact on head motion data, anxiety reduction, procedural preparedness, usability, cognitive workload, and subjective preference. Results show that the gamified VR condition has significantly lower head motion (p < 0.001) and yielded the highest preparedness scores (p < 0.05). Head motion data were significantly correlated with learning outcomes (p < 0.01), suggesting that behavioral performance in VR strongly indicates procedural readiness. While all modalities reduced anxiety and were rated usable, interactive VR was preferred by most participants and demonstrated unique advantages in promoting engagement and behavioral rehearsal. We conclude with design recommendations for designing immersive simulations and integrating VR training into pediatric imaging workflows.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted