Creating benchmarkable components to measure the quality ofAI-enhanced developer tools

April 16, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› CHI Extended Abstracts

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Elise Paradis, Ambar Murillo, Maulishree Pandey, Sarah D'Angelo, Matthew Hughes, Andrew Macvean, Ben Ferrari-Church arXiv ID 2504.12211 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Cross-listed cs.HC Citations 1 Venue CHI Extended Abstracts Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In the AI community, benchmarks to evaluate model quality are well established, but an equivalent approach to benchmarking products built upon generative AI models is still missing. This has had two consequences. First, it has made teams focus on model quality over the developer experience, while successful products combine both. Second, product team have struggled to answer questions about their products in relation to their competitors. In this case study, we share: (1) our process to create robust, enterprise-grade and modular components to support the benchmarking of the developer experience (DX) dimensions of our team's AI for code offerings, and (2) the components we have created to do so, including demographics and attitudes towards AI surveys, a benchmarkable task, and task and feature surveys. By doing so, we hope to lower the barrier to the DX benchmarking of genAI-enhanced code products.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted