Quantifying Emotional Arousal through Pupillary Response: A Novel Approach for Isolating the Luminosity Effect and Predicting Affective States
April 04, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Zeel Pansara, Gabriele Navyte, Tatiana Freitas-Mendes, Camila Bottger, Edoardo Franco, Luca Citi, Erik S. Jacobi, Giulia L. Poerio, Helge Gillmeister, Caterina Cinel, Vito De Feo
arXiv ID
2504.13886
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Pupil dilation is recognized as an objective indicator of emotional arousal, but confounding factors such as the luminosity of stimuli and the surrounding environment have greatly limited its practical usefulness. This study presents a new approach to isolate and remove the effect of luminosity on pupil dilation. We validated this approach by showing 32 video clips with different content and emotional intensity to 47 participants, who reported their level of emotional arousal after each video. We developed a model capable of predicting the effect of luminosity on pupil size as a function of screen brightness, which adapts to individual physiological differences and different types of monitors through a brief pre-experimental calibration. We thus estimated the pupil size due exclusively to luminosity and subtracted it from the total recorded pupil size, obtaining the component due exclusively to arousal. From the latter, we predicted the arousal of each participant for each video using two models. We first used a simple linear regression model. When we used the luminosity-corrected pupil size, we obtained a correlation between predicted and self-reported arousal of r = 0.65 +/- 0.12, and R2 of 0.43 +/- 0.12. The uncorrected pupil size, instead, showed virtually no predictive power (r = 0.26 +/- 0.15, R2 = 0.09 +/- 0.089). We then used an Extreme Gradient Boosting model, obtaining even better results in the case of luminosity correction (r = 0.765 +/- 0.047, R2 = 0.556 +/- 0.085). Our results highlight that separating emotional and luminosity components from pupillary responses is crucial for accurately predicting arousal.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted