Towards True Work-Efficiency in Parallel Derandomization: MIS, Maximal Matching, and Hitting Set

April 22, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Mohsen Ghaffari, Christoph Grunau arXiv ID 2504.15700 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DC Citations 0 Venue IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Derandomization is one of the classic topics studied in the theory of parallel computations, dating back to the early 1980s. Despite much work, all known techniques lead to deterministic algorithms that are not work-efficient. For instance, for the well-studied problem of maximal independent set -- e.g., [Karp, Wigderson STOC'84; Luby STOC' 85; Luby FOCS'88] -- state-of-the-art deterministic algorithms require at least $m \cdot poly(\log n)$ work, where $m$ and $n$ denote the number of edges and vertices. Hence, these deterministic algorithms will remain slower than their trivial sequential counterparts unless we have at least $poly(\log n)$ processors. In this paper, we present a generic parallel derandomization technique that moves exponentially closer to work-efficiency. The method iteratively rounds fractional solutions representing the randomized assignments to integral solutions that provide deterministic assignments, while maintaining certain linear or quadratic objective functions, and in an \textit{essentially work-efficient} manner. As example end-results, we use this technique to obtain deterministic algorithms with $m \cdot poly(\log \log n)$ work and $poly(\log n)$ depth for problems such as maximal independent set, maximal matching, and hitting set.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted