Subexponential and Parameterized Mixing Times of Glauber Dynamics on Independent Sets
April 25, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Malory Marin
arXiv ID
2504.18427
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.DM
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Given a graph $G$, the hard-core model defines a probability distribution over its independent sets, assigning to each set of size $k$ a probability of $\frac{Ξ»^k}{Z}$, where $Ξ»>0$ is a parameter known as the \emph{fugacity} and $Z$ is a normalization constant. The Glauber dynamics is a simple Markov chain that converges to this distribution and enables efficient sampling. Its \emph{mixing time}, the number of steps needed to approach the stationary distribution, has been widely studied across various graph classes, with most previous work emphasizing the dichotomy between polynomial and exponential mixing times, with a particular focus on sparse classes of graphs. Inspired by the modern fine-grained approach to computational complexity, we investigate subexponential mixing times of the Glauber dynamics on geometric intersection graphs, such as disk graphs. We further study parameterized mixing times with respect to two structural parameters that can remain small even in dense graphs: the tree-independence number and the path-independence number. Building on a result of Dyer, Greenhill, and MΓΌller, we show that Glauber dynamics mixes in polynomial time on graphs of bounded path-independence number, and in quasi-polynomial time when the tree-independence number is bounded. Moreover, we prove that both bounds are tight via a conductance argument, thereby resolving a question raised in their work. This work provides a simple and efficient algorithm for sampling from the hard-core model. Unlike classical approaches that rely explicitly on geometric representations or on constructing decompositions such as tree decompositions or separator trees, our analysis only requires their existence to establish mixing time bounds-these structures are not used directly by the algorithm itself.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted