Online General Knapsack with Reservation Costs

April 29, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Workshop on Approximation and Online Algorithms

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Elisabet Burjons, Matthias Gehnen arXiv ID 2504.20855 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 1 Venue Workshop on Approximation and Online Algorithms Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In the online general knapsack problem, an algorithm is presented with an item $x=(s,v)$ of size $s$ and value $v$ and must irrevocably choose to pack such an item into the knapsack or reject it before the next item appears. The goal is to maximize the total value of the packed items without overflowing the knapsack's capacity. As this classical setting is way too harsh for many real-life applications, we will analyze the online general knapsack problem under the reservation model. Here, instead of accepting or rejecting an item immediately, an algorithm can delay the decision of whether to pack the item by paying a fraction $0\le Ξ±$ of the size or the value of the item. This models many practical applications, where, for example, decisions can be delayed for some costs e.g. cancellation fees. We present results for both variants: First, for costs depending on the size of the items and then for costs depending on the value of the items. If the reservation costs depend on the size of the items, we find a matching upper and lower bound of $2$ for every $Ξ±$. On the other hand, if the reservation costs depend on the value of the items, we find that no algorithm is competitive for reservation costs larger than $1/2$ of the item value, and we find upper and lower bounds for the rest of the reservation range $0\leΞ±< 1/2$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted