Inattentional Blindness with Augmented Reality HUDS: An On-road Study
May 01, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Nayara de Oliveira Faria, Joseph L. Gabbard
arXiv ID
2505.00879
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
As the integration of augmented reality (AR) technology in head-up displays (HUDs) becomes more prevalent in vehicles, it is crucial to understand how to design and evaluate AR interfaces to ensure safety. With new AR displays capable of rendering images with larger field of views and at varying depths, the visual and cognitive separation between graphical and real-world visual stimuli will be increasingly more difficult to quantify as will drivers' ability to efficiently allocate visual attention between the two sets of stimuli. In this study, we present a user study that serves as a crucial first step in gaining insight into inattentional blindness while using AR in surface transportation, where understanding is currently limited. Our primary goal is to investigate how the visual demand of AR tasks influences drivers' ability to detect stimuli, and whether the nature of the stimuli itself plays a role in this effect. To address these questions, we designed an on-road user study aimed at producing a more realistic and ecologically valid understanding of the phenomenon. Our results show that drivers' ability to timely detect stimuli in the environment decreased as the AR task visual demand increased demonstrated by both detection performance and inattentional blindness metrics. Further, inattentional blindness caused by AR displays appears to be more prevalent within drivers' central field of view. We conclude by discussing implications towards a safety-centric evaluation framework for AR HUDs.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted