What Is Next for LLMs? Next-Generation AI Computing Hardware Using Photonic Chips
May 09, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Renjie Li, Wenjie Wei, Qi Xin, Xiaoli Liu, Sixuan Mao, Erik Ma, Zijian Chen, Malu Zhang, Haizhou Li, Zhaoyu Zhang
arXiv ID
2505.05794
Category
cs.AR: Hardware Architecture
Cross-listed
cs.AI,
cs.NE
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly pushing the limits of contemporary computing hardware. For example, training GPT-3 has been estimated to consume around 1300 MWh of electricity, and projections suggest future models may require city-scale (gigawatt) power budgets. These demands motivate exploration of computing paradigms beyond conventional von Neumann architectures. This review surveys emerging photonic hardware optimized for next-generation generative AI computing. We discuss integrated photonic neural network architectures (e.g., Mach-Zehnder interferometer meshes, lasers, wavelength-multiplexed microring resonators) that perform ultrafast matrix operations. We also examine promising alternative neuromorphic devices, including spiking neural network circuits and hybrid spintronic-photonic synapses, which combine memory and processing. The integration of two-dimensional materials (graphene, TMDCs) into silicon photonic platforms is reviewed for tunable modulators and on-chip synaptic elements. Transformer-based LLM architectures (self-attention and feed-forward layers) are analyzed in this context, identifying strategies and challenges for mapping dynamic matrix multiplications onto these novel hardware substrates. We then dissect the mechanisms of mainstream LLMs, such as ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and LLaMA, highlighting their architectural similarities and differences. We synthesize state-of-the-art components, algorithms, and integration methods, highlighting key advances and open issues in scaling such systems to mega-sized LLM models. We find that photonic computing systems could potentially surpass electronic processors by orders of magnitude in throughput and energy efficiency, but require breakthroughs in memory, especially for long-context windows and long token sequences, and in storage of ultra-large datasets.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Hardware Architecture
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Corona: System Implications of Emerging Nanophotonic Technology
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A scalable multi-core architecture with heterogeneous memory structures for Dynamic Neuromorphic Asynchronous Processors (DYNAPs)
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
SpAtten: Efficient Sparse Attention Architecture with Cascade Token and Head Pruning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Neural Cache: Bit-Serial In-Cache Acceleration of Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
SpArch: Efficient Architecture for Sparse Matrix Multiplication
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted