Redefining Research Crowdsourcing: Incorporating Human Feedback with LLM-Powered Digital Twins

May 29, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› CHI Extended Abstracts

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Amanda Chan, Catherine Di, Joseph Rupertus, Gary Smith, Varun Nagaraj Rao, Manoel Horta Ribeiro, AndrΓ©s Monroy-HernΓ‘ndez arXiv ID 2505.24004 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.CL, cs.CY Citations 3 Venue CHI Extended Abstracts Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Crowd work platforms like Amazon Mechanical Turk and Prolific are vital for research, yet workers' growing use of generative AI tools poses challenges. Researchers face compromised data validity as AI responses replace authentic human behavior, while workers risk diminished roles as AI automates tasks. To address this, we propose a hybrid framework using digital twins, personalized AI models that emulate workers' behaviors and preferences while keeping humans in the loop. We evaluate our system with an experiment (n=88 crowd workers) and in-depth interviews with crowd workers (n=5) and social science researchers (n=4). Our results suggest that digital twins may enhance productivity and reduce decision fatigue while maintaining response quality. Both researchers and workers emphasized the importance of transparency, ethical data use, and worker agency. By automating repetitive tasks and preserving human engagement for nuanced ones, digital twins may help balance scalability with authenticity.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted