Interpretation Meets Safety: A Survey on Interpretation Methods and Tools for Improving LLM Safety

June 05, 2025 ยท The Cartographer ยท ๐Ÿ› Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

๐Ÿ“š THE CARTOGRAPHER: The Cartographer
Survey/review paper โ€” maps the landscape rather than implementing a method.

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: Interpretation Meets Safety: A Survey on Interpretation Methods and Tools for Improving LLM Safety"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Seongmin Lee, Aeree Cho, Grace C. Kim, ShengYun Peng, Mansi Phute, Duen Horng Chau arXiv ID 2506.05451 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.CL Citations 5 Venue Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Last Checked 23 hours ago
Abstract
As large language models (LLMs) see wider real-world use, understanding and mitigating their unsafe behaviors is critical. Interpretation techniques can reveal causes of unsafe outputs and guide safety, but such connections with safety are often overlooked in prior surveys. We present the first survey that bridges this gap, introducing a unified framework that connects safety-focused interpretation methods, the safety enhancements they inform, and the tools that operationalize them. Our novel taxonomy, organized by LLM workflow stages, summarizes nearly 70 works at their intersections. We conclude with open challenges and future directions. This timely survey helps researchers and practitioners navigate key advancements for safer, more interpretable LLMs.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Software Engineering