Efficient Algorithms to Compute Closed Substrings

June 06, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· + Add venue

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Samkith K Jain, Neerja Mhaskar arXiv ID 2506.06452 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 1 Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
A closed string $u$ is either of length one or contains a border that occurs only as a prefix and as a suffix in $u$ and nowhere else within $u$. In this paper, we present fast $\mathcal{O}(n\log n)$ time algorithms to compute all $\mathcal{O}(n^2)$ closed substrings by introducing a compact representation for all closed substrings of a string $ w[1..n]$, using only $\mathcal{O}(n \log n)$ space. These simple and space-efficient algorithms also compute maximal closed strings. Furthermore, we compare the performance of these algorithms and identify classes of strings where each performs best. Finally, we show that the exact number of MCSs ($M(f_n)$) in a Fibonacci word $ f_n $, for $n \geq 5$, is $\approx \left(1 + \frac{1}{Ο†^2}\right) F_n \approx 1.382 F_n$, where $ Ο†$ is the golden ratio.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted