Revisiting a Successful Reduction Rule for Dominating Set

June 17, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· + Add venue

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Lukas Geis, Alexander Leonhardt, Johannes Meintrup, Ulrich Meyer, Manuel Penschuck, Lukas Retschmeier arXiv ID 2506.14564 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 0 Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Given a graph $G = (V, E)$ with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, the DominatingSet problem asks for a set $D \subseteq V$ of minimal cardinality such that every vertex either is in $D$ or adjacent to a member of $D$. Although there is little hope for a kernelization algorithm on general graphs due to the W[2]-hardness of DominatingSet, data reduction rules are extensively used in practice. In this context, Rule1 due to Alber, Fellows, and Niedermeier [JACM 2004] has been shown to be very powerful, yet its best-known running time is $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$ ($= \mathcal{O}(nm)$) for general graphs. In this work, we propose, to the best of our knowledge, the first $\mathcal{O}(n + m)$-time algorithm for Rule1 on general graphs. We additionally propose simple, but practically significant, extensions to our algorithmic framework to further prune the input instances. We complement our theoretical claims with experiments that confirm the practicality of our approach. On average, we see significant speedups of over one order of magnitude while removing $59.8\times$ more nodes and $410.9\times$ more edges than the original formulation across a large dataset comprised of real-world and synthetic networks.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted