Fully-Dynamic Parallel Algorithms for Single-Linkage Clustering
June 23, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Quinten De Man, Laxman Dhulipala, Kishen N Gowda
arXiv ID
2506.18384
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.DC
Citations
1
Venue
ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Single-linkage clustering is a popular form of hierarchical agglomerative clustering (HAC) where the distance between two clusters is defined as the minimum distance between any pair of points across the two clusters. In single-linkage HAC, the output is typically the single-linkage dendrogram (SLD), which is the binary tree representing the hierarchy of clusters formed by iteratively contracting the two closest clusters. In the dynamic setting, prior work has only studied maintaining a minimum spanning forest over the data since single-linkage HAC reduces to computing the SLD on the minimum spanning forest of the data. In this paper, we study the problem of maintaining the SLD in the fully-dynamic setting. We assume the input is a dynamic forest $F$ (representing the minimum spanning forest of the data) which receives a sequence of edge insertions and edge deletions. To our knowledge, no prior work has provided algorithms to update an SLD asymptotically faster than recomputing it from scratch. All of our update algorithms are asymptotically faster than the best known static SLD computation algorithm, which takes $O(n \log h)$ time where $h$ is the height of the dendrogram ($h \leq n-1$). Furthermore, our algorithms are much faster in many cases, such as when $h$ is low. Our first set of results are an insertion algorithm in $O(h)$ time and a deletion algorithm in $O(h \log (1+n/h))$ time. Next, we describe parallel and batch-parallel versions of these algorithms which are work-efficient or nearly work-efficient and have poly-logarithmic depth. Finally, we show how to perform insertions near-optimally in $O(c \log(1+n/c))$ time, where $c$ is the number of structural changes in the dendrogram caused by the update, and give a work-efficient parallel version of this algorithm that has polylogarithmic depth.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted