Do Electric Vehicles Induce More Motion Sickness Than Fuel Vehicles? A Survey Study in China
June 27, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Weiyin Xie, Chunxi Huang, Jiyao Wang, Dengbo He
arXiv ID
2506.22674
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Cross-listed
cs.CY,
stat.AP
Citations
1
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Electric vehicles (EVs) are a promising alternative to fuel vehicles (FVs), given some unique characteristics of EVs, for example, the low air pollution and maintenance cost. However, the increasing prevalence of EVs is accompanied by widespread complaints regarding the high likelihood of motion sickness (MS) induction, especially when compared to FVs, which has become one of the major obstacles to the acceptance and popularity of EVs. Despite the prevalence of such complaints online and among EV users, the association between vehicle type (i.e., EV versus FV) and MS prevalence and severity has not been quantified. Thus, this study aims to investigate the existence of EV-induced MS and explore the potential factors leading to it. A survey study was conducted to collect passengers' MS experience in EVs and FVs in the past one year. In total, 639 valid responses were collected from mainland China. The results show that FVs were associated with a higher frequency of MS, while EVs were found to induce more severe MS symptoms. Further, we found that passengers' MS severity was associated with individual differences (i.e., age, gender, sleep habits, susceptibility to motion-induced MS), in-vehicle activities (i.e., chatting with others and watching in-vehicle displays), and road conditions (i.e., congestion and slope), while the MS frequency was associated with the vehicle ownership and riding frequency. The results from this study can guide the directions of future empirical studies that aim to quantify the inducers of MS in EVs and FVs, as well as the optimization of EVs to reduce MS.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted