Ranking-based Fusion Algorithms for Extreme Multi-label Text Classification (XMTC)

July 04, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Celso FranΓ§a, Gestefane Rabbi, Thiago Salles, Washington Cunha, Leonardo Rocha, Marcos AndrΓ© GonΓ§alves arXiv ID 2507.03761 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Citations 2 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In the context of Extreme Multi-label Text Classification (XMTC), where labels are assigned to text instances from a large label space, the long-tail distribution of labels presents a significant challenge. Labels can be broadly categorized into frequent, high-coverage \textbf{head labels} and infrequent, low-coverage \textbf{tail labels}, complicating the task of balancing effectiveness across all labels. To address this, combining predictions from multiple retrieval methods, such as sparse retrievers (e.g., BM25) and dense retrievers (e.g., fine-tuned BERT), offers a promising solution. The fusion of \textit{sparse} and \textit{dense} retrievers is motivated by the complementary ranking characteristics of these methods. Sparse retrievers compute relevance scores based on high-dimensional, bag-of-words representations, while dense retrievers utilize approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) algorithms on dense text and label embeddings within a shared embedding space. Rank-based fusion algorithms leverage these differences by combining the precise matching capabilities of sparse retrievers with the semantic richness of dense retrievers, thereby producing a final ranking that improves the effectiveness across both head and tail labels.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted