RunPacer: A Smartwatch-Based Vibrotactile Feedback System for Symmetric Co-Running by Visually Impaired Individuals and Guides

July 06, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Yichen Yu, Huan-Song Xu, Ming-Yen Lin arXiv ID 2507.04241 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 0 Venue International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Visually impaired individuals often require a guide runner to safely participate in outdoor running. However, maintaining synchronized pacing with verbal cues or tethers can be mentally taxing and physically restrictive. Existing solutions primarily focus on navigation or obstacle avoidance but overlook the importance of real-time interpersonal rhythm coordination during running. We introduce RunPacer, a smartwatch-based vibrotactile feedback system that delivers synchronized rhythmic pulses to both runners. In contrast to conventional guide-running systems that rely heavily on continuous verbal communication or mechanical tethering, RunPacer emphasizes interpersonal cadence alignment as its core interaction model. By pre-setting a target step frequency or dynamically adapting to the guide's natural pace, the system ensures that both runners receive identical haptic cues, enabling them to maintain coordinated motion intuitively and efficiently. This poster presents the system architecture, positions it within prior research on haptic entrainment, and outlines the vision for future field deployment, including potential multimodal feedback extensions. RunPacer contributes a lightweight, socially cooperative, and non-visual assistive framework that reimagines co-running as a shared, embodied, and accessible experience.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted