Color Distance Oracles and Snippets: Separation Between Exact and Approximate Solutions
July 06, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Embedded Systems and Applications
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Noam Horowicz, Tsvi Kopelowitz
arXiv ID
2507.04578
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
0
Venue
Embedded Systems and Applications
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
In the snippets problem, the goal is to preprocess text $T$ so that given two patterns $P_1$ and $P_2$, one can locate the occurrences of the two patterns in $T$ that are closest to each other, or report their distance. Kopelowitz and Krauthgamer [CPM2016] showed upper bound tradeoffs and conditional lower bounds tradeoffs for the snippets problem, by utilizing connections between the snippets problem and the problem of constructing a color distance oracle (CDO), which is a data structure that preprocess a set of points with associated colors so that given two colors $c$ and $c'$ one can quickly find the (distance between the) closest pair of points with colors $c$ and $c'$. However, the existing upper bound and lower bound curves are not tight. Inspired by recent advances by Kopelowitz and Vassilevska-Williams [ICALP2020] regarding Set-disjointness data structures, we introduce new conditionally optimal algorithms for $(1+\varepsilon)$ approximation versions of the snippets problem and the CDO problem, by applying fast matrix multiplication. For example, for CDO on $n$ points in an array with preprocessing time $\tilde{O}(n^a)$ and query time $\tilde{O}(n^b)$, assuming that $Ο=2$ (where $Ο$ is the exponent of $n$ in the runtime of the fastest matrix multiplication algorithm on two squared matrices of size $n\times n$), we show that approximate CDO can be solved with the following tradeoff $$ a + 2b = 2 \text{ if } 0 \leq b \leq \frac1 3$$ $$ 2a + b = 3 \text{ if } \frac13\leq b \leq 1.$$ Moreover, we prove that for exact CDO on points in an array, the algorithm of Kopelowitz and Krauthgamer [CPM2016], is essentially optimal assuming that the strong APSP hypothesis holds for randomized algorithms. Thus, the exact version of CDO is strictly harder than the approximate version.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted