A Randomized Rounding Approach for DAG Edge Deletion

July 10, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Workshop and International Workshop on Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sina Kalantarzadeh, Nathan Klein, Victor Reis arXiv ID 2507.07943 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 0 Venue International Workshop and International Workshop on Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
In the DAG Edge Deletion problem, we are given an edge-weighted directed acyclic graph and a parameter $k$, and the goal is to delete the minimum weight set of edges so that the resulting graph has no paths of length $k$. This problem, which has applications to scheduling, was introduced in 2015 by Kenkre, Pandit, Purohit, and Saket. They gave a $k$-approximation and showed that it is UGC-Hard to approximate better than $\lfloor 0.5k \rfloor$ for any constant $k \ge 4$ using a work of Svensson from 2012. The approximation ratio was improved to $\frac{2}{3}(k+1)$ by Klein and Wexler in 2016. In this work, we introduce a randomized rounding framework based on distributions over vertex labels in $[0,1]$. The most natural distribution is to sample labels independently from the uniform distribution over $[0,1]$. We show this leads to a $(2-\sqrt{2})(k+1) \approx 0.585(k+1)$-approximation. By using a modified (but still independent) label distribution, we obtain a $0.549(k+1)$-approximation for the problem, as well as show that no independent distribution over labels can improve our analysis to below $0.542(k+1)$. Finally, we show a $0.5(k+1)$-approximation for bipartite graphs and for instances with structured LP solutions. Whether this ratio can be obtained in general is open.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted