Fine-tuning ORBGRAND with Very Few Channel Soft Values

July 11, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› 2025 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC Workshops)

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Li Wan, Huarui Yin, Wenyi Zhang arXiv ID 2507.08696 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Citations 3 Venue 2025 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC Workshops) Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Guessing random additive noise decoding (GRAND) is a universal decoding paradigm that decodes by repeatedly testing error patterns until identifying a codeword, where the ordering of tests is generated by the received channel values. On one hand, while testing error patterns in a descending order of posterior probabilities leads to maximum likelihood decoding, its implementation complexity is prohibitive. On the other hand, testing error patterns with a prescribed set of error patterns permuted by the ranking among magnitudes of log-likelihood ratios (i.e., ordered reliability bits, ORB) enables efficient implementation, but results in performance loss for finite-length codes. Aiming at harnessing the strengths of these two approaches, this work proposes a fine-tuning method to improve ORBGRAND, adjusting the ordering of tests with the aid of very few exact channel soft values. This method is based on a metric for assessing the ``well-orderedness'' of error patterns. The metric is studied via the lens of the asymptotic theory of integer partitioning, which provides highly accurate estimation in numerical experiments. The metric then leads to an effective identification of fine-tuning to conduct, at the cost of a negligible increment of complexity. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed fine-tuning method achieves a substantial performance enhancement compared with ORBGRAND.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Theory

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted