Nearly Tight Sample Complexity for Matroid Online Contention Resolution

July 13, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Moran Feldman, Ola Svensson, Rico Zenklusen arXiv ID 2507.09507 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DM, cs.GT Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Due to their numerous applications, in particular in Mechanism Design, Prophet Inequalities have experienced a surge of interest. They describe competitive ratios for basic stopping time problems where random variables get revealed sequentially. A key drawback in the classical setting is the assumption of full distributional knowledge of the involved random variables, which is often unrealistic. A natural way to address this is via sample-based approaches, where only a limited number of samples from the distribution of each random variable is available. Recently, Fu, Lu, Gavin Tang, Wu, Wu, and Zhang (2024) showed that sample-based Online Contention Resolution Schemes (OCRS) are a powerful tool to obtain sample-based Prophet Inequalities. They presented the first sample-based OCRS for matroid constraints, which is a heavily studied constraint family in this context, as it captures many interesting settings. This allowed them to get the first sample-based Matroid Prophet Inequality, using $O(\log^4 n)$ many samples (per random variable), where $n$ is the number of random variables, while obtaining a constant competitiveness of $\frac{1}{4}-\varepsilon$. We present a nearly optimal sample-based OCRS for matroid constraints, which uses only $O(\log ρ\cdot \log^2\logρ)$ many samples, almost matching a known lower bound of $Ω(\log ρ)$, where $ρ\leq n$ is the rank of the matroid. Through the above-mentioned connection to Prophet Inequalities, this yields a sample-based Matroid Prophet Inequality using only $O(\log n + \logρ\cdot \log^2\logρ)$ many samples, and matching the competitiveness of $\frac{1}{4}-\varepsilon$, which is the best known competitiveness for the considered almighty adversary setting even when the distributions are fully known.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted