Dual-Numbers Reverse AD for Functional Array Languages

July 16, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Tom Smeding, MikoΕ‚aj Konarski, Simon Peyton Jones, Andrew Fitzgibbon arXiv ID 2507.12640 Category cs.PL: Programming Languages Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
The standard dual-numbers construction works well for forward-mode automatic differentiation (AD) and is attractive due to its simplicity; recently, it also has been adapted to reverse-mode AD, but practical performance, especially on array programs, leaves a lot to be desired. In this paper we introduce first-class support for multidimensional arrays in dual-numbers reverse-mode AD with little to no performance overhead. The algorithm consists of three loosely-coupled components: a semantics-preserving vectorisation code transformation (the bulk-operation transform or BOT), a fairly straightforward lifting of the basic dual-numbers reverse AD algorithm to a mostly first-order array language, and symbolic interpretation to achieve an end-to-end compilation pipeline. Unfortunately, we lose some of the nice generalisable aspects of dual-numbers AD in the process, most importantly support for higher-order code. We do support some higher-order array combinators, but only a carefully-chosen set: 'build' (elementwise array construction), 'gather' and 'scatter'. In return, the BOT can eliminate the essential (for AD) higher-orderness of the input program, meaning that AD gets essentially presented with a first-order program. This allows the naive trick of lifting dual numbers to "dual arrays" to work without much modification.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Programming Languages

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted