Enhancing Smart Grid Information Exchanges: A Three-Phase Method for Evaluating Information and Data Models during their Development Process

July 16, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· + Add venue

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Christine van Stiphoudt, Sergio Potenciano Menci, Gilbert Fridgen arXiv ID 2507.12649 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 0 Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
The ongoing process of smart grid digitalisation is increasing the volume of automated information exchange across distributed energy systems. This has driven the development of new information and data models when existing models fail to offer an optimal description of the requisite information due to be exchanged. To prevent potential operational disruption - i.e. in the provision of flexibility - caused by flaws in these newly designed models, it is essential to conduct evaluations during the development process before these models are deployed. Current practices differ across domains. Beyond smart grid applications, information models are evaluated through explicit reviews using quality characteristics. Within smart grid contexts, evaluation focuses on data models and implicit system-level conformance and interoperability testing. However, no existing approach combines these explicit and implicit evaluation methods for both information and data models during their development. This limits early fault detection and increases potential model correction costs. To address this gap, we propose a three-phase evaluation method based on design science research. Our method integrates explicit and implicit approaches, applies them to information and data models and is adaptable to various design stages. We also introduce a set of quality characteristics to support explicit model evaluation. Overall, our contribution enhances the reliability and interoperability of smart grid information exchange.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted