A 1/2-Approximation for Budgeted $k$-Submodular Maximization
July 17, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Chenhao Wang
arXiv ID
2507.12875
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.DM,
math.OC
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
A $k$-submodular function naturally generalizes submodular functions by taking as input $k$ disjoint subsets, rather than a single subset. Unlike standard submodular maximization, which only requires selecting elements for the solution, $k$-submodular maximization adds the challenge of determining the subset to which each selected element belongs. Prior research has shown that the greedy algorithm is a 1/2-approximation for the monotone $k$-submodular maximization problem under cardinality or matroid constraints. However, whether a firm 1/2-approximation exists for the budgeted version (i.e., with a knapsack constraint) has remained open for several years. We resolve this question affirmatively by proving that the 1-Guess Greedy algorithm, which first guesses an appropriate element from an optimal solution before proceeding with the greedy algorithm, achieves a 1/2-approximation. This result is asymptotically tight as $((k+1)/(2k)+Ξ΅)$-approximation requires exponentially many value oracle queries even without constraints (Iwata et al., SODA 2016). We further show that 1-Guess Greedy is 1/3-approximation for the non-monotone problem. This algorithm is both simple and parallelizable, making it well-suited for practical applications. Using the thresholding technique from (Badanidiyuru and Vondrak, SODA 2014), it runs in nearly $\tilde O(n^2k^2)$ time. The proof idea is simple: we introduce a novel continuous transformation from an optimal solution to a greedy solution, using the multilinear extension to evaluate every fractional solution during the transformation. This continuous analysis approach yields two key extensions. First, it enables improved approximation ratios of various existing algorithms. Second, our method naturally extends to $k$-submodular maximization problems under broader constraints, offering a more flexible and unified analysis framework.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted