Near-Optimality for Single-Source Personalized PageRank

July 19, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· + Add venue

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Xinpeng Jiang, Haoyu Liu, Siqiang Luo, Xiaokui Xiao arXiv ID 2507.14462 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC Citations 0 Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
The \emph{Single-Source Personalized PageRank} (SSPPR) query is central to graph OLAP, measuring the probability $Ο€(s,t)$ that an $Ξ±$-decay random walk from node $s$ terminates at $t$. Despite decades of research, a significant gap remains between upper and lower bounds for its computational complexity. Existing upper bounds are $O\left(\min\left(\frac{\log(1/Ξ΅)}{Ξ΅^2}, \frac{\sqrt{m \log n}}Ξ΅, m \log \frac{1}Ξ΅\right)\right)$ for SSPPR-A and $O\left(\min\left(\frac{\log(1/n)}Ξ΄, \sqrt{m \log(n/Ξ΄)}, m \log \left(\frac{\log(n)}{mΞ΄}\right)\right)\right)$ for SSPPR-R, with trivial lower bounds of $Ξ©(\min(n,1/Ξ΅))$ and $Ξ©(\min(n,1/Ξ΄))$. This work narrows or closes this gap. We improve the upper bounds for SSPPR-A and SSPPR-R to $O\left(\frac{1}{Ξ΅^2}\right)$ and $O\left(\min\left(\frac{\log(1/Ξ΄)}Ξ΄, m + n \log(n) \log \left(\frac{\log(n)}{mΞ΄}\right)\right)\right)$, respectively, offering improvements by factors of $\log(1/Ξ΅)$ and $\log\left(\frac{\log(n)}{mΞ΄}\right)$. On the lower bound side, we establish stronger results: $Ξ©(\min(m, 1/Ξ΅^2))$ for SSPPR-A and $Ξ©(\min(m, \frac{\log(1/Ξ΄)}Ξ΄))$ for SSPPR-R, strengthening theoretical foundations. Our upper and lower bounds for SSPPR-R coincide for graphs with $m \in Ξ©(n \log^2 n)$ and any threshold $Ξ΄, 1/Ξ΄\in O(\text{poly}(n))$, achieving theoretical optimality in most graph regimes. The SSPPR-A query attains partial optimality for large error thresholds, matching our new lower bound. This is the first optimal result for SSPPR queries. Our techniques generalize to the Single-Target Personalized PageRank (STPPR) query, improving its lower bound from $Ξ©(\min(n, 1/Ξ΄))$ to $Ξ©(\min(m, \frac{n}Ξ΄ \log n))$, matching the upper bound and revealing its optimality.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted