A systematic literature review to unveil users objective reaction to virtual experiences: Complemented with a conceptual model (QoUX in VE)

July 25, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Alireza Mortezapour, Andrea Antonio Cantone, Monica Maria Lucia Sebillo, Giuliana Vitiello arXiv ID 2507.19104 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 1 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In pursuit of documenting users Neurophysiological responses during experiencing virtual environments (VE), this systematic review presents a novel conceptual model of UX in VE. Searching across seven databases yielded to 1743 articles. Rigorous screenings, included only 66 articles. Notably, UX in VE lacks a consensus definition. Obviously, this UX has many unique sub-dimensions that are not mentioned in other products. The presented conceptual model contains 26 subdimensions which mostly not supported in previous subjective tools and questionnaires. While EEG and ECG were common, brain ultrasound, employed in one study, highlights the need for using neurophysiological assessments to comprehensively grasp immersive UX intricacies.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
πŸ“„ View on arXiv 🌐 View on ar5iv πŸ“‘ PDF πŸŽ‰ Report Code Found
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted