Settling Weighted Token Swapping up to Algorithmic Barriers

July 30, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Nicole Wein, Guanyu Tony Zhang arXiv ID 2507.22450 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We study the weighted token swapping problem, in which we are given a graph on $n$ vertices, $n$ weighted tokens, an initial assignment of one token to each vertex, and a final assignment of one token to each vertex. The goal is to find a minimum-cost sequence of swaps of adjacent tokens to reach the final assignment from the initial assignment, where the cost is the sum over all swaps of the sum of the weights of the two swapped tokens. Unweighted token swapping has been extensively studied: it is NP-hard to approximate to a factor better than $14/13$, and there is a polynomial-time 4-approximation, along with a tight "barrier" result showing that the class of locally optimal algorithms cannot achieve a ratio better than 4. For trees, the problem remains NP-hard to solve exactly, and there is a polynomial-time 2-approximation, along with a tight barrier result showing that the class of $\ell$-straying algorithms cannot achieve a ratio better than 2. Weighted token swapping with $\{0,1\}$ weights is much harder to approximation: it is NP-hard to approximate even to a factor of $(1-\varepsilon) \cdot \ln n$ for any constant $\varepsilon>0$. Restricting to positive weights, no approximation algorithms are known, and the only known lower bounds are those inherited directly from the unweighted version. We provide the first approximation algorithms for weighted token swapping on both trees and general graphs, along with tight barrier results. Letting $w$ and $W$ be the minimum and maximum token weights, our approximation ratio is $2+2W/w$ for general graphs and $1+W/w$ for trees.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted