How Many Times Do People Usually Experience Different Kinds of Stressors Each Day?
August 03, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π UbiComp Companion
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Sameer Neupane, Mithun Saha, David M. Almeida, Santosh Kumar
arXiv ID
2508.01553
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
0
Venue
UbiComp Companion
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Understanding how frequently people experience different kinds of daily stressors is crucial for interpreting stress exposure and informing mental health care. But it can't be directly estimated from current assessment methods, such as diaries, end-of-day interviews, and ecological momentary assessments (EMA), that use sparse sampling to limit participant burden, and a structured response format for uniformity. In this paper, we utilize stressor data collected in a 100-day field study with 68 participants that adopted wearable-triggered prompts and a freeform format to solicit stressors soon after they occurred, but limited its prompts to a small subset to keep the burden low. We develop asymptotic models to estimate the latent frequency of different kinds of real-life stressors that address sample sparsity and sampling bias. We find that people experience 5.39 stressors per day, on average. The top three are related to work (1.76/day), health (0.59/day), and transportation (0.55/day). These estimates offer a principled benchmark for interpreting individual stressor loads. They can also inform mental health care treatments and interventions by establishing population-level baselines.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted