๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Towards EXPTIME One Way Functions: Bloom Filters, Succinct Graphs, Cliques, & Self Masking
August 03, 2025 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐ arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Shlomi Dolev
arXiv ID
2508.01649
Category
cs.CC: Computational Complexity
Cross-listed
cs.CR,
cs.DS
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Consider graphs of n nodes, and use a Bloom filter of length 2 log3 n bits. An edge between nodes i and j, with i < j, turns on a certain bit of the Bloom filter according to a hash function on i and j. Pick a set of log n nodes and turn on all the bits of the Bloom filter required for these log n nodes to form a clique. As a result, the Bloom filter implies the existence of certain other edges, those edges (x, y), with x < y, such that all the bits selected by applying the hash functions to x and y happen to have been turned on due to hashing the clique edges into the Bloom filter. Constructing the graph consisting of the clique-selected edges and those edges mapped to the turned-on bits of the Bloom filter can be performed in polynomial time in n. Choosing a large enough polylogarithmic in n Bloom filter yields that the graph has only one clique of size log n, the planted clique. When the hash function is black-boxed, finding that clique is intractable and, therefore, inverting the function that maps log n nodes to a graph is not (likely to be) possible in polynomial time.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Computational Complexity
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
An Exponential Separation Between Randomized and Deterministic Complexity in the LOCAL Model
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
The Parallelism Tradeoff: Limitations of Log-Precision Transformers
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
The Hardness of Approximation of Euclidean k-means
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Slightly Superexponential Parameterized Problems
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal