Identity Theft in AI Conference Peer Review

August 06, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Communications of the ACM

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Nihar B. Shah, Melisa Bok, Xukun Liu, Andrew McCallum arXiv ID 2508.04024 Category cs.DL: Digital Libraries Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.CR Citations 1 Venue Communications of the ACM Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We discuss newly uncovered cases of identity theft in the scientific peer-review process within artificial intelligence (AI) research, with broader implications for other academic procedures. We detail how dishonest researchers exploit the peer-review system by creating fraudulent reviewer profiles to manipulate paper evaluations, leveraging weaknesses in reviewer recruitment workflows and identity verification processes. The findings highlight the critical need for stronger safeguards against identity theft in peer review and academia at large, and to this end, we also propose mitigating strategies.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Digital Libraries

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted