Subset Sum in Near-Linear Pseudopolynomial Time and Polynomial Space

August 05, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Thejas Radhika Sajith arXiv ID 2508.04726 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Given a multiset $A = \{a_1, \dots, a_n\}$ of positive integers and a target integer $t$, the Subset Sum problem asks if there is a subset of $A$ that sums to $t$. Bellman's [1957] classical dynamic programming algorithm runs in $O(nt)$ time and $O(t)$ space. Since then, much work has been done to reduce both the time and space usage. Notably, Bringmann [SODA 2017] uses a two-step color-coding technique to obtain a randomized algorithm that runs in $\tilde{O}(n+t)$ time and $\tilde{O}(t)$ space. Jin, Vyas and Williams [SODA 2021] build upon the algorithm given by Bringmann, using a clever algebraic trick first seen in Kane's Logspace algorithm, to obtain an $\tilde{O}(nt)$ time and $\tilde{O}(\log(nt))$ space randomized algorithm. A SETH-based lower-bound established by Abboud et al. [SODA 2019] shows that Bringmann's algorithm is likely to have near-optimal time complexity. We build on the techniques used by Jin et al. to obtain a randomized algorithm running in $\tilde{O}(n+t)$ time and $\tilde{O}(n^2 + n \log^2 t)$ space, resulting in an algorithm with near-optimal runtime that also runs in polynomial space. We use a multipoint evaluation-based approach to speed up a bottleneck step in their algorithm. We also provide a simple polynomial space deterministic algorithm that runs in $\tilde{O}(n^2t)$ time and $\tilde{O}(n \log^2 t)$ space.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted