RAGTrace: Understanding and Refining Retrieval-Generation Dynamics in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

August 08, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sizhe Cheng, Jiaping Li, Huanchen Wang, Yuxin Ma arXiv ID 2508.06056 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 2 Venue ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have emerged as a promising solution to enhance large language models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge retrieval with generative capabilities. While significant advancements have been made in improving retrieval accuracy and response quality, a critical challenge remains that the internal knowledge integration and retrieval-generation interactions in RAG workflows are largely opaque. This paper introduces RAGTrace, an interactive evaluation system designed to analyze retrieval and generation dynamics in RAG-based workflows. Informed by a comprehensive literature review and expert interviews, the system supports a multi-level analysis approach, ranging from high-level performance evaluation to fine-grained examination of retrieval relevance, generation fidelity, and cross-component interactions. Unlike conventional evaluation practices that focus on isolated retrieval or generation quality assessments, RAGTrace enables an integrated exploration of retrieval-generation relationships, allowing users to trace knowledge sources and identify potential failure cases. The system's workflow allows users to build, evaluate, and iterate on retrieval processes tailored to their specific domains of interest. The effectiveness of the system is demonstrated through case studies and expert evaluations on real-world RAG applications.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted